The fullscreen to 'normal' on my MacBook Pro with the Zoom meeting recording is quite different. As I made it fullscreen there was a huge difference in quality of the pixels ratio. Dropped a lot when fullscreen.
The YouTube upload was not a noticeable difference between the 'normal' and fullscreen. Voice/visual synchronised better here.
I think the Zoom has a larger screen format (1240p ?) than the YouTube. Picture quality was about the same, however that would be determined how your recording it and (i.e. 4K) compression as you can record in 4K and compress it to 1240 without loss of quality. Most do not know this and your light balance. I am still impress more with the Zoom .
I think the zoom is clearer and a little bigger. here is a screen shot of both of them.
ReplyDeletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/bH_E4pMIf7OFdoRAqdeVI2ykmBThPUUUi1okymiZFUF95BK4l0wyS_RNgeBf3DnY7pr8BKbTwo4TVg=s0
Richard Clarkson
ReplyDeleteThanks Richard, Much appreciated
Any time Andrew Hatchett. you're welcome as always.
ReplyDeleteThe fullscreen to 'normal' on my MacBook Pro with the Zoom meeting recording is quite different. As I made it fullscreen there was a huge difference in quality of the pixels ratio. Dropped a lot when fullscreen.
ReplyDeleteThe YouTube upload was not a noticeable difference between the 'normal' and fullscreen. Voice/visual synchronised better here.
Ros Boundy
ReplyDeleteThanks for the feedback.
Zoom cloud is better. like your background.
ReplyDeleteI think the Zoom has a larger screen format (1240p ?) than the YouTube. Picture quality was about the same, however that would be determined how your recording it and (i.e. 4K) compression as you can record in 4K and compress it to 1240 without loss of quality. Most do not know this and your light balance. I am still impress more with the Zoom .
ReplyDeleteRoosevelt Gist Thanks for the feedback.
ReplyDeleteArthur Morehead
ReplyDeleteI doubt I'll ever be recording in 4k. The material I deal with just doesn't benefit that much from it.