Thursday, April 20, 2017

*Latest tip from Peggy K

*Latest tip from Peggy K
http://www.peggyktc.com/2017/04/add-music-to-your-google-photos-movie.html?spref=gp

5 comments:

  1. I did that once years ago on 5 of my videos through YouTube which they did it themselves after I approved it. Well now I can not do anything with them as Youtube has claimed the copyright was violated. Now I cant do anything with them, Not even edit or delete them. However Youtube has monetized them and are using them as they wish. I will never do this again. (The music source was Alibaba btw)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for sharing Andrew Hatchett!
    Arthur Morehead it's not YouTube making the claims, it's the copyright holders. If you have a license to use the music on videos, then you should be able to dispute.

    ReplyDelete
  3. YouTube says different, I have already tried. There's more to this as it was Youtube who offered the service to begin with. I chose the music and changing the audio file was done by YouTube themselves, I don't have time to reopen this can of worms but I can get you all the information you like as I still have it on file (even the sound tracks)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Arthur Morehead I think I understand what you are describing, and some of the music that YouTube offers through audio swap (for example) does allow the copyright holders to claim and monetize the video. However, the songs through the YouTube Audio Library should be free to use with no strings (other than attribution when required).

    ReplyDelete
  5. Peggy K Yes you do understand exactly and it has always been this way for YouTube , However over time policies change and so do services as well as ToS and what was once free for one is no longer the case for others. YouTube should take on the responsibilities of what has changed and at least let me do the necessary changes but to this day they say they can't or will not do that So meanwhile they have the control over my 5 videos, although I still have the original files. In other words I would have to pay for an attorney for them to "see the light" but then that would be at the risk of getting banned altogether. It's a "kids glove" situation. You must remember I have seen all these companies grow out of their diapers and now think they can do what ever they want

    ReplyDelete