Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Your thoughts on the quality of Part 1 vs Part II would be appreciated

Your thoughts on the quality of Part 1 vs Part II would be appreciated

Thanks!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iq2gLrLngHE

10 comments:

  1. Andrew Hatchett  This one has color now. the other one didnt.  Voice is the same. the other one was like gray and white. this one has nice color and is very clear.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Richard Clarkson This is actually two videos [1st part was HOA and ended at 1:09 , 2nd part (not recorded on YouTube but uploaded there) started then and went until it ended].Which did you think had better quality- the beginning or the end?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Audio was a bit more subdued in the second part (after 1:09) but video was sharper. Screen changed from what looked like letterbox (wide) in the first part to what looked like 4:3 in the second but was sharper in the second art as mentioned above and slightly brighter colors too.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Andrew Hatchett the 2nd one was like Lon McClure said. much sharper and voice quieter and not as clear to me.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey Andrew Hatchett for me the video was the same in both and was clear although not as much glare in the second. Audio was clear on both although much lower in the second. Hope this helps.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I gotta say it was crsiper in part two, but not sure it was a valuable difference.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The picture quality on the second video was a bit more detail. I don't know if it was the camera focusing better, but the User to User log just above your right shoulder was sharper and a little more detail in your shirt. First one was 16:9 format and second 4:3 image. Audio same on both.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Second one better video, crisper picture. The audio was lower after 1:09 Andrew Hatchett

    ReplyDelete